Pourzal v. Marriott International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing a claim for “tortious interference with prospective advantage” under the same standard
• “This Court has previously decided that a prima facie tort claim must be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) if it is duplicative of other asserted claims.” (citing Moore, 23 V.I. at 240)
• “This Court has previously decided that a prima facie tort claim must be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) if it is duplicative of other asserted claims.” (citing Moore, 23 V.I. at 240)
• applying Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 766-69 (1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).