Skip to main content
· 10/29/1982

Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 1177
  • 98 Nev. 453
  • 1982 Nev. LEXIS 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and that the decision to entertain such a writ rests within this court's discretion
  • recognizing that a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and that the decision to entertain such a writ rests within this court's discretion
  • recognizing that it is within this court's discretion to determine if a petition will be considered
  • observing that mandamus is extraordinary remedy, and it is within this court's discretion to determine if petition will be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.