Poulos v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting insurance contract to permit deduction of workers' compensation benefits from UM payments to the extent the workers' compensation benefits represented a double recovery
• recognizing the public policy against double recovery
• insurer’s deduction of insured’s workers’ compensation benefits permissible only to the extent of double recovery
• deduction for workers’ compensation benefits received by insured held void as against public policy
• where an injured employee’s personal UIM coverage includes an offset provision regarding workers’ compensation, such clause is enforceable only to the extent that it prevents a double recovery by the injured employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).