Pouliot v. Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an independent contractor, who was injured while unloading truck, was not operating a motor vehicle and therefore was not an employee under § 390.5
• holding “the definition of ‘employee’ in section 390.5 would apply to an independent contractor while the contractor is driving his commercial motor vehicle on any public or private road or highway”
• holding “the definition of ‘employee’ in section 390.5 would apply to an independent contractor while the contractor is driving his commercial motor vehicle on any public or private road or highway”
• holding A the definition of > employee = in section 390.5 would apply to an independent contractor while the contractor is driving his commercial motor vehicle on any public or private road or highway @
• “the existence of a lease under regulations that impose liability between the carrier-lessee and the public does not have any impact on the type of relationship that exists between the carrier-lessee and the contractor-lessor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).