Potts v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• consideration of unproven criminal charges at sentencing violates substantive due process
• consideration of unproven criminal charges at sentencing violates substantive due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-01· cited 102×
• P.W.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13· cited 20×
• State v. Potts
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-08-31· cited 11×
• State v. Lite
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-22· cited 10×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-13· cited 8×
• In Interest of DM
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-21· cited 3×
• Young v. Broward County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-05· cited 1×
• PWG v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trushin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-11-04· cited 96×
• State v. Walker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-08· cited 31×
• State v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-12-20· cited 22×
• Alexander v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 21×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-12· cited 19×
• Alexander v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-16· cited 14×