Skip to main content
· 2/16/1891

Potts v. Jones

Citations

  • 140 Pa. 48
  • 21 A. 240
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 800

Syllabus

<p>In trover for the conversion of a horse, where an issue is raised by the testimony as to whether the plaintiff had traded his horse to the defendant or not, an instruction, that “ plaintiff is not entitled to rescind the trade and reclaim the horse, unless defendant perpetrated a fraud upon him,” would be error, the point assuming the question of fact in dispute.</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.