Potts v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding subsection 7B-911(c)(2)(a) was not satisfied since “the court did not find that there was no longer a need for continued State intervention on behalf of [the juvenile].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).