Pottle v. School Committee of Braintree

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that public employees have \diminished expectations of privacy\
• unnecessary to balance public and private interests where disclosure would not \invade the privacy\ of specified individuals
• “Public employees, by virtue of their public employment, have diminished expectations of privacy”
• names, addresses, and job classifications of school employees are not exempt from disclosure
• invasion of privacy standard under the public records 16 exemption at issue in Collector of Lynn is “a standard more favorable to nondisclosure than [the Massachusetts Privacy Act]’”
• public school employees’ names and home addresses do not fall within exemption [c]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).