Pottinger v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that OCGA § 51-1-29.5 requires a patient to prove that emergency department physician's treatment constituted gross negligence which \has been defined as equivalent to the failure to exercise even a slight degree of care\ (punctuation omitted)
• reversing denial of summary judgment when complaint and expert affidavit, taken together, failed to maintain a question of material fact whether defendants were grossly negligent
• reversing denial of summary judgment when complaint and expert affidavit, taken together, failed to maintain a question of material fact whether defendants were grossly negligent
• finding insufficient evidence of gross negligence under OCGA § 51-1-29.5 (c)
• finding insufficient evidence of gross negligence under OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).