· 3/31/2000
Potter v. Xerox Corp.
Citations
- 88 F. Supp. 2d 109
- 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1253
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4722
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1116
- 2000 WL 357978
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if plaintiff could not hold any job, “he would be barred from asserting a claim under the ADA because there would exist no reasonable accommodation that would allow him to work”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.