Skip to main content
· 3/31/2000

Potter v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 88 F. Supp. 2d 109
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1253
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4722
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1116
  • 2000 WL 357978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if plaintiff could not hold any job, “he would be barred from asserting a claim under the ADA because there would exist no reasonable accommodation that would allow him to work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.