Skip to main content
· 2/9/1996

Potter v. Wal Computers, Inc.

Citations

  • 469 S.E.2d 691
  • 220 Ga. App. 437
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 691
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that not every violation of the Uniform Superior Court Rules constitutes reversible error because substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
  • noting that not every violation of the Uniform Superior Court Rules constitutes reversible error because substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
  • not every violation of the USCR constitutes reversible error; substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
  • new trial unwarranted “when parties have actual notice of an upcoming trial and are prejudiced only by their own lack of due diligence”
  • new trial unwarranted “when parties have actual notice of an upcoming trial and are prejudiced only by their own lack of due diligence”
  • party had actual notice of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, McMurray, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.