· 2/9/1996
Potter v. Wal Computers, Inc.
Citations
- 469 S.E.2d 691
- 220 Ga. App. 437
- 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 691
- 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that not every violation of the Uniform Superior Court Rules constitutes reversible error because substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
- noting that not every violation of the Uniform Superior Court Rules constitutes reversible error because substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
- not every violation of the USCR constitutes reversible error; substantial compliance is acceptable under certain circumstances
- new trial unwarranted “when parties have actual notice of an upcoming trial and are prejudiced only by their own lack of due diligence”
- new trial unwarranted “when parties have actual notice of an upcoming trial and are prejudiced only by their own lack of due diligence”
- party had actual notice of trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburn, McMurray, Andrews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.