Potter v. Stamfli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a correctional board’s failure to expressly analyze three contradictory letters arbitrary and capricious
• “Corrections Board acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in disregarding contrary evidence without analysis”
• “[W]e apply the same standard of review the trial court did. Accordingly, we will not disturb the Correction Board’s decision unless it was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).