Potter v. Skiles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could not state a claim arising out of alleged violation of FMLA posting and notice requirements where the plaintiff was never denied benefits and his FMLA rights were not impaired or prejudiced in any way
• dismissing interference claim where plaintiff asserted both retaliation and interference because interference claim was essentially a retaliation claim
• “[B]ecause of the similarity between the evidence for FMLA retaliation and FMLA interference when the interference claimed is termination or elimination of the position, many courts doubt the validity of these claims when styled as interference claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).