Potter v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no proceeding pending in Wisconsin when complaint filed but not yet served when, under Wisconsin law, commencement of an action was conditional on service within sixty days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Schmidt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-02-24· cited 28×
• Dorothy R. Cannon v. The Kroger Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 1988-01-29· cited 24×
• Leslie L. F. v. Constance F.
  New York Family Court· 1981-07-27· cited 22×
• Mebert v. Mebert
  New York Family Court· 1981-11-10· cited 15×
• Elder v. Park
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-04-01· cited 14×
• Houtchens v. Houtchens
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1985-03-06· cited 12×
• In re B.B.R.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-02· cited 10×
• Trask v. Trask
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-25· cited 9×
• Meier v. Davignon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-24· cited 8×
• S. Frederick P. v. Barbara P.
  NYC Family Court· 1982-07-26· cited 5×
• Matter of BBR
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-02· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vanneck v. Vanneck
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-03-27· cited 105×
• William L. v. Michelle P.
  New York Family Court· 1979-04-20· cited 20×