Potter v. New Jersey Supreme Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding requirement that applicants to the bar attend an ABA-accredited law school did not deny plaintiff a property interest “in continued permission to sit for the [state bar] examination”
• “It is beyond serious question that a state may regulate an occupation which affects the public interest by setting qualification reasonably related to competency.”
• upholding predecessor to Rule 1:24-2(b) against equal protection challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).