Potter v. Engert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Recognizing that importance to the litigation is a separate consideration from relevance under both Federal Rules and comity factors
• acknowledging that “enforcement of United States trademark and copyright laws is a significant interest.”
• “Relevance focuses on the claims and defenses in the case, not its general subject matter”
• “Relevance focuses on the claims and defenses in the case, not its general subject matter”
• “Relevance focuses on the claims and defenses in the case, not its general subject matter”
• “Relevance focuses on the claims and defenses in the case, not its general subject matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).