· 7/7/2000
Potter v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND IND.
Citations
- 3 P.3d 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Department may reduce retroactive lump-sum benefits “in the same 2 Yetter initiated this appeal in the Supreme Court along with a statement of grounds for direct review and that court transferred the appeal to this court. See RAP 4.2(e)(1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.