Skip to main content
· 7/7/2000

Potter v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND IND.

Citations

  • 3 P.3d 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Department may reduce retroactive lump-sum benefits “in the same 2 Yetter initiated this appeal in the Supreme Court along with a statement of grounds for direct review and that court transferred the appeal to this court. See RAP 4.2(e)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.