Potomac Plaza Terraces, Inc. v. QSC Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the economic loss doctrine to preclude plaintiff from recovering for damages to the product itself
• permitting both breach of implied warranty and strict products liability claims to go forward where the plaintiff and the defendant had a contractual relationship
• finding “the District of Columbia ‘has not authorized tort recovery for purely economic losses in a contract setting’ ”
• applying the economic loss doctrine to preclude plaintiff from recovering for damages to the product itself
• roofing materials were not “household goods” where they were not “furniture, furnishings and personal effects used ... in the dwelling.”
• permitting strict liability and implied warranty claims where the parties had a contractual relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).