Potomac Insurance v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that applying the same state law called for by a choice-of-law provision “protect[ed] justified expectations and promote[d] uniformity”
• “Even Kentucky law, with its egocentric twist on choice of law rules, acknowledges that there are situations in which its laws should not be applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).