Potlatch Corp. v. Arkansas City School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense counsel’s decision not to object to replaying of video of victim’s interview because, in part, strategy was to portray defendant as having nothing to hide did not amount to ineffective assistance
• holding that defense counsel’s decision not to object to replaying of video of victim’s interview because, in part, strategy was to portray defendant as having nothing to hide did not amount to ineffective assistance
• evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction for child molestation for showing a pornographic video to a child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).