Poteet v. Bethke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that service was defective because the complaint and summons were left at an address that the defendant had permanently moved from ten months earlier
• defendant’s insurance carrier was not defendant’s agent for service of process absent express designation as such
• service was defective when summons was sent to an address where Poteet no longer lived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).