Skip to main content
· 8/5/1996

POTATO SALES COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent

Citations

  • 92 F.3d 800
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 9456
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5788
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19194
  • 1996 WL 435556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner's violations were \flagrant” and thus declining to decide whether they were also \repeated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brunetti, Rymer, Tanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.