Post v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not erroneously interfere with the voir dire process by asking questions in order to clarify a juror's position or instruct a juror (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coggeshall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-15· cited 291×
• Glauser v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-05-16· cited 60×
• Ortiz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-10· cited 55×
• Stallings v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-05-10· cited 11×
• Carson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-09-28· cited 9×
• Fugon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-06-10· cited 3×
• Justin Jay Shot With Two Arrows v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-12-20· cited 3×
• Jessie Earl Nicholson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2019-02-26· cited 2×
• Charles A. Ewing v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-06-29
• Cesilee Hyde v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-05-14
• Burke, David Todd
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27
• Donte Lewayne Wilson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2016-08-03
• Dietrich, Kyle Carpenter
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-12-29