Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining an appellate court will not speculate about the basis of the award or become a factfinder
• declining to “speculate that the [ALJ] made ‘the conclusion’ that no causal relationship existed” between a new condition and the original injury
• vacating decision in which Commission merely \set forth the ultimate legal conclusion\ after \quoting some testimony and citing general principles of workers' compensation law\
• requiring specific findings to allow the court to review the decision and award for legal soundness and for a sufficient factual basis
• requiring the ALJ to make necessary factual findings, resolve conflicts in the evidence, and provide a basis for a reviewing court to evaluate its legal analysis
• requiring ALJs to include sufficient findings to ensure that judicial review is possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).