Skip to main content
· 3/24/1993

Post-Newsweek Cable, Inc. v. Board of Review

Citations

  • 497 N.W.2d 810
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 77
  • 1993 WL 81436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where federal law preempted local regulation of cable television rates, the state was nevertheless permitted to tax the cable company on its tangible property located in the state
  • holding that where federal law preempted local regulation of cable television rates, the state was nevertheless permitted to tax the cable company on its tangible property located in the state
  • stating difference between value determined under income approach and much lower value determined under cost approach suggested nontaxable assets were included in income-method valuation
  • finding the cost approach more reliable in the valuation of property of a cable television company
  • defining a “disinterested witness” as “[o]ne who has no right, claim, title, or legal share in the cause or matter in issue, and who is lawfully competent to testify”
  • stating difference between value determined under income approach and much lower value determined under cost approach suggested nontaxable assets were included in income-method valuation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Schultz, Carter, Lavorato, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.