Poskin v. TD Banknorth, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because Congress used “both the terms ‘person’ and ‘credit repair organization’ in § 1679b,... the terms are not . . . interchangeably read[,]” and allowing the claim to proceed in the absence of credit repair organization
• \A person who is not a party to a contract does not have standing to assert rights under the contract\
• “Express disclaimers of agency do not necessarily negate the existence of the agency relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).