Posey v. Lake Pend Oreille School District No. 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the evidence of [the nonmovant] is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor.”
• stating that “the evidence of [the nonmovant] is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor.”
• stating that “the evidence of [the nonmovant] is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor”
• “Upon consideration, we agree with the Third, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits and hold that the determination ... presents a mixed question of fact and law.”
• dispute over whether a school security guard’s duties related to student discipline extended to internal communications on security policies
• fact that Posey wrote letter at issue on his own time and with his own resources was not dispositive of whether he wrote it pursuant to his official duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).