Portugal v. Portugal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that section 4302 of the Domestic Relations Code “broadly states that ‘all forms of retirement’ -7- J-S19044-15 and ‘pensions’ constitute income.”
• emphasizing that this Court does not “have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from an order of spousal support until a divorce is final”
• concluding trial court did not abuse its discretion by remedying Husband’s overpayment of spousal support with a monthly credit towards child support
• reiterating that a determination of earning capacity must consider the party’s age, education, training, health, work experience, earnings history, and child care responsibilities
• stating this Court reviews a trial court’s calculation of the amount of child support for an abuse of discretion
• “Child support is a shared responsibility requiring both parents to contribute to the support of their children in accordance with their relative incomes and ability to pay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).