Skip to main content
· 11/6/1972

Portner v. United States

Citations

  • 409 U.S. 983
  • 93 S. Ct. 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that state authorization does not deprive EPA of its criminal jurisdiction under federal act
  • noting employee's \position of responsibility with MacDonald & Watson\ and fact that she reviewed the contracts on behalf of the company in finding evidence sufficient to support her conviction
  • noting employee’s “position of responsibility with MacDonald & Watson” and fact that she reviewed the contracts on behalf of the company in finding evidence sufficient to support her conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.