Portland Ice Co. v. Connor
Citations
- 24 Pa. Super. 493
- 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 220
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Sale—Payment—Course of business — Rescission.</p> <p>Where, under a contract for the sale of a large quantity of ice, to be shipped as ordered, payments to be made weekly, payments are not made weekly, and this has continued for a year or more with the assent of the seller, the latter cannot, in view of the previous course of dealing, make a sudden, unconditional and absolute rescission, the purchaser being solvent, and not having wilfully refused to pay bills overdue. In such a case notice of the seller’s intention to insist on a strict and literal compliance with the terms of the contract as to future bills should precede rescission</p>
Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.