Portland General Electric Co. v. Bonneville Power Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BPA’s statutory authority to enter into settlement agreements pursuant to section 2(f) of the Project Act is cabined by the agency’s other statutory obligations
• holding that BPA’s statutory authority to enter into settlement agreements pursuant to section 2(f) of the Project Act is cabined by the agency’s other statutory obligations
• holding that BPA’s statutory authority to enter into settlement agreements pursuant to section 2(f) of the Project Act is cabined by the agency’s other statutory obligations
• holding that BPA’s statutory authority to enter into settlement agreements pursuant to section 2(f) of the Project Act is cabined by the agency’s other statutory obligations
• explaining that failure to exhaust is excused where “[the] agency ... had an opportunity to consider the issue[,] .... even if the issue was considered sua sponte by the agency”
• noting that BPA is “charg[ed] to function as a business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).