Portfolio v. Rubin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]epeals by implication are not favored ... and especially is this true of implied repeals of the common law.” (quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2010-07-29· cited 26×
• Rosing v. Parkside Mills, Inc.
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1921-06-15

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Norrington v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1885-10-26· cited 264×
• In re Carnegie Trust Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-06-07· cited 25×
• Wolf v. Dietzsch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 23×
• Barrie v. Earle
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1886-10-23· cited 22×
• Buckeye Buggy Co. v. Montana Stables, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1906-07-10· cited 16×
• Maynard & Cheeves v. Render
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1895-03-02· cited 5×
• Simon v. Wood
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1896-07-15· cited 4×