Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Jennifer Campney
Syllabus
Jennifer Campney appeals an order from the trial court granting judgment in favor of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Cooling & Winter, LLC. On appeal, Campney argues the trial court erred by (1) ruling that she was liable to PRA in the amount of $4,236.78, plus costs, under an account stated cause of action (2) ruling that PRA and was not liable to her on her counterclaims and (3) denying her motion pursuant to Rules 52 and 59(e), SCRCP. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an ex post facto claim can only be successful if the law can be characterized \as 'punishment' in the constitutional sense\
- holding that a law barring Communist Party members from offices in labor unions is a bill of attainder
- holding that an ex post facto claim can only be successful if the law can be characterized “as ‘punishment’ in the constitutional sense”
- holding that the termination of social security benefits does not constitute punishment for purposes of, inter alia, the Ex Post Facto Clause
- holding that Social Security Act provision terminating benefits to aliens upon deportation does not deny due process
- holding that, in the court’s analysis of a governmental decision under the rational basis standard, “it is, of course, constitutionally irrelevant whether this reasoning in fact underlay [a governmental] decision”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.