· 9/20/2011
Porter v. United States Capitol Police Board
Citations
- 816 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106178
- 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 767
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Granting a motion as conceded constitutes a final judgment on the merits for claim-preclusion purposes.because the parties had a full and fair opportunity, to litigate the claim in the prior action.”
- “The Supreme Court has made clear that a showing of disparate impact alone is not sufficient to prevail on an equal-protection challenge.” (citing Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 238–239 (1976))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.