Porter v. Towns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of a continuing constitutional violation constitutes proof of an irreparable harm, and its remedy certainly would serve the public interest.”
• district court ordered that prisoners be allowed two showers a week
• injunction in public interest where continuing con- stitutional violation is proof of irreparable harm
• injunction in public interest where continuing con- stitutional violation is proof of irreparable harm
• injunction in public interest where continuing con- stitutional violation is proof of irreparable harm
• “[A] continuing constitutional violation constitutes proof of an irreparable harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).