Skip to main content
· 7/8/2013

Porter v. Quarantillo

Citations

  • 722 F.3d 94
  • 91 Fed. R. Serv. 1161
  • 2013 WL 3368888
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that only “admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible
  • “[O]nly admissible evidence need be 5 considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”
  • “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment”
  • “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and a “district court deciding a summary judgment motion has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence.”
  • “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and a “district court deciding a summary judgment motion has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence.” (internal citation omitted)
  • hearsay statements are not admissible evidence for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Carney, Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.