· 7/8/2013
Porter v. Quarantillo
Citations
- 722 F.3d 94
- 91 Fed. R. Serv. 1161
- 2013 WL 3368888
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that only “admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible
- “[O]nly admissible evidence need be 5 considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”
- “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment”
- “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and a “district court deciding a summary judgment motion has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence.”
- “[O]nly admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and a “district court deciding a summary judgment motion has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence.” (internal citation omitted)
- hearsay statements are not admissible evidence for summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Carney, Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.