Porter v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “domicile requirements” under RSA 458:5 “cannot be conferred by consent”
• holding that the “domicile requirements” under RSA 458:5 “cannot be conferred by consent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stottlemyer v. Stottlemyer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-05· cited 45×
• State v. Adams
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 35×
• Fiorentino v. Probate Court
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-03-29· cited 31×
• Larsen v. Gallogly
  D. Rhode Island· 1973-07-16· cited 18×
• Ashley v. Ashley
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1974-05-16· cited 4×
• Asadorian v. Asadorian
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-10-30· cited 1×
• In the Matter of Crystal Ndyaija and Joshua Ndyaija
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-03-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shapiro v. Thompson
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
• Boddie v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
• Dunn v. Blumstein
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 2,034×
• Wymelenberg v. Syman
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1971-06-30· cited 35×
• Burgess v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1902-04-01· cited 8×