Porter v. Houma Terrebonne Housing Authority Board of Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering evidence of differential treatment received by four employees but noting that the plaintiff had “not demonstrated that those four employees were similarly situated”
• considering evidence of differential treatment received by four employees but noting that the plaintiff had “not demonstrated that those four employees were similarly situated”
• finding a six-and-a-half-week gap between the protected act and the adverse employment action sufficient to show a prima facie case of causation
• finding a six-and-a-half- week gap between the protected act and the adverse employment action sufficient to show a prima facie case of causation
• finding six- and-a-half-week timeframe between protected activity and adverse employment action sufficient to satisfy causation requirement
• considering evidence of differential treatment received by four employees but noting that the plaintiff had not demonstrated that those employees were similarly situated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).