· 2/13/1991
Porter v. Food Giant, Inc.
Citations
- 402 S.E.2d 766
- 198 Ga. App. 736
- 102 Fulton County D. Rep. 22
- 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is contrary to the generally accepted principles for construing statutes to ‘read out’ any part of the statute as ‘mere surplusage’ unless there is a clear reason for doing so”
- “It is contrary to the generally accepted principles for construing statutes to ‘read out’ any part of the statute as ‘mere surplusage’ unless there is a clear reason for doing so.”
- “It is contrary to the generally accepted principles for construing statutes to ‘read out’ any part of the statute as ‘mere surplusage’ unless there is a clear reason for doing so.”
- \It is contrary to the generally accepted principles for construing statutes to `read out' any part of the statute as `mere surplusage' unless there is a clear reason for doing so.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews, Pope, Beasley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.