Porter v. Dana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that for tax assessment purposes Gorga requires that a zoning change or variance must be probable rather than merely possible before such evidence is admissible
• stating that “property must be valued in its existing zoned use unless there is a probability of a change in zoning”
• stating that “property must be valued in its existing zoned use unless there is a probability of a change in zoning”
• indicating that for tax assessment purposes, State v. Gorga, 26 N.J. 113, 138 A. 2d 833 (1958), requires that a zoning change or variance must be probable rather than merely possible before such evidence is admissible
• “The property must be valued in its existing zoning use unless there is a probability of a change in zoning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).