Porter v. Bullard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding in part that because the employees were acting within the scope of their employment, suit “could have been brought” against the governmental unit under the Act
• “If the purpose of serving the employer’s business motivates the employee, his acts are within the scope of employment.”
• “If the purpose of serving the employer’s business motivates the employee, his acts are within the scope of employment.”
• “If the purpose of serving the employer’s business motivates the employee, his acts are within the scope of employment.”
• fact that conduct may be driven by personal motives does not prevent act from being within scope of employment
• in evaluating whether school officials were acting within general scope of employment, considering their act to be general act of evaluating faculty performance instead of tort-specific act of fraudulently removing faculty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).