Skip to main content
· 9/4/1986

Porter v. Arco Metals, Div. of Atlantic Richfield

Citations

  • 642 F. Supp. 1116
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that model rule 4.2 may preclude ex parte contacts with former employees who exercised managerial responsibilities with respect to the matters in litigation
  • suggesting that model rule 4.2 may preclude ex parte contacts with former employees who exercised managerial responsibilities with respect to the matters in litigation
  • Upjohn indicates that \the attorney-client priv- ilege may extend to [defendant's] former employees . . . [with regard to their communications with] the company's counsel.\
  • relying on Wright but stating the test differently
  • only former non-managerial employees may be contacted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lovell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.