· 2/6/1990
Porten Sullivan Corp. v. State
Citations
- 568 A.2d 1111
- 318 Md. 387
- 1990 Md. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that despite history of deference to legislative branch, the single subject provision is “still a part of 11 our Constitution” and as such “it is not to be treated as a dead letter”
- stating that despite history of deference to legislative branch, the single subject provision is “still a part of 11 our Constitution” and as such “it is not to be treated as a dead letter”
- an act imposing ethical requirements on county council members and others and extending council's authority to impose energy and transfer taxes violates one-subject rule
- explaining Maryland’s similar provision has two objectives
- explaining Maryland’s similar provision has two objectives
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.