· 5/17/1962
Portella v. Sonnenberg
Citations
- 181 A.2d 385
- 74 N.J. Super. 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- merger is a technical rule, so if there is any reason, such as an existing encumbrance, for keeping an outstanding interest alive, equity will not destroy it through merger
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Conford, Gaulkin and Kilkenny
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.