Skip to main content
· 5/17/1962

Portella v. Sonnenberg

Citations

  • 181 A.2d 385
  • 74 N.J. Super. 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • merger is a technical rule, so if there is any reason, such as an existing encumbrance, for keeping an outstanding interest alive, equity will not destroy it through merger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Conford, Gaulkin and Kilkenny

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.