Skip to main content
· 7/1/1880

Porte v. Gourgant

Citations

  • 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of motion to modify property distribution where final dissolution decree was entered, Congress enacted relevant law and intended retroactive effect, but motion did not allege sufficient facts to set aside final order
  • “[I]n Deering ... we held that, as a matter of Maryland law, all pensions and retirement benefits accruing during the marriage were marital property,” emphasis added
  • Maryland cases “have rigorously emphasized the finality of judgments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spencer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.