Skip to main content
· 10/18/1989

Portaro v. Portaro (In Re Portaro)

Citations

  • 108 B.R. 142
  • 1989 WL 151753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that attorneys fees awarded by state court which reflected an “intention to prevent economic harm to [the ex-spouse] during the divorce litigation” represented nondischargeable support
  • label is not determinative of obligation; court must examine facts of each case and make determination based upon federal bankruptcy law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.