Portales National Bank v. Bellin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the conclusions stated in affidavits against summary judgment which are unsupported by fact are insufficient to raise an issue of material fact
• unless will itself is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to supplement language of will
• conclusions stated in affidavits against summary judgment, unsupported by fact, are not sufficient to raise issue of material fact
• “Where a will is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to vary, contradict or supplement the language of a will, or to give a different intention on the part of the testator from that stated in the will itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).