Porria v. Town of Castle Rock
Citations
- 82 Wash. 103
- 143 P. 315
Syllabus
<p>Boundaeies— Lost Boundaries— Actions to Establish — Pleadings and Issues. In an action to establish a lost boundary line under the statute, it is not error to refuse to allow the complaint to ,be amended for the reestablishment of the original boundary line, where issues were thereafter raised by answers and cross-complaints setting up title by adverse possession to a boundary line fence; since the amendment sought would raise an immaterial issue in view of the answers and cross-complaints.</p> <p>Same — Actions to Establish — Costs. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 949, providing for the apportionment of costs in statutory proceedings for the survey and establishment of lost boundaries, does not apply where the evidence failed to establish that the boundary had been lost, and defendants prevailed on cross-complaints alleging title by adverse possession to the line of a boundary fence.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statute of frauds did not bar enforcement of agreement for sale of goods where goods were delivered within one year, even though price was to be paid at a time beyond one year
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.