Skip to main content
· 6/4/1993

Porras v. Bell

Citations

  • 857 P.2d 676
  • 18 Kan. App. 2d 569
  • 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court erred in failing to give an instruction on intent because the pretrial order specifically alleged violations of subsections in 50-626(b) in which intent is an element
  • intent is a required element for a claim under the KCPA
  • intent is a required element for a claim under the KCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Rulon, Pierron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.