Porges v. Weitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this is test for determining whether there is substantial risk of miscarriage of justice
• analyzing whether unpreserved possible Doyle issue created substantial risk of miscarriage of justice; no mention of Mahdi factors
• limiting review to whether there was any error, and if so, whether that error created substantial risk of miscarriage of justice
• setting forth factors applicable to standard of review for unpreserved errors in noncapital cases
• “stalking by harassment and stalking by following are lesser included offenses of stalking by harassment in violation of a court order and stalking by following in violation of a court order, respectively”
• appellate court considers whether “counsel’s failure to object was not simply a reasonable tactical decision” [citation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).